From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedman v. Gleeson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 2002
300 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-09448

Argued November 12, 2002.

December 9, 2002.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an award of an arbitration board, dated September 13, 2000, which directed the petitioner to return $4,000 in attorney's fees to the respondent James Gleeson, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated October 1, 2001, which, inter alia, denied the petition, confirmed the award, and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

Sari M. Friedman, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Mace H. Greenfield of counsel), appellant pro se.

James Gleeson, St. Charles, Mo., respondent pro se.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

An arbitration award in a mandatory arbitration proceeding, such as this one, will be upheld if it is supported by the evidence and is not "arbitrary and capricious" (Matter of Motor Vehicle Acc. Indem. Corp. v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 89 N.Y.2d 214, 223). Contrary to the appellant's contention, the arbitration panel's determination was amply supported by the evidence in the record, and was not "arbitrary and capricious" (Matter of Motor Vehicle Acc. Indem. Corp. v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., supra).

FLORIO, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, McGINITY and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Friedman v. Gleeson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 2002
300 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Friedman v. Gleeson

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF SARI M. FRIEDMAN, P.C., appellant, v. JAMES GLEESON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 9, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 859

Citing Cases

Matter of Eagle Ins. Co.

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs. "An arbitration award in a mandatory…

In the Matter of Eagle Ins. v. First Cardinal

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. An arbitration award in a mandatory arbitration proceeding…