From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedman v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 22, 1955
285 App. Div. 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion

March 22, 1955.

Present — Peck, P.J., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.


Order granting temporary alimony and counsel fee unanimously reversed, and the motion denied on the ground that when the action was commenced the parties were still living together ( Berman v. Berman, 277 App. Div. 560; Sommer v. Sommer, 285 App. Div. 809). No showing is made as to the necessity for plaintiff remaining at the matrimonial domicile while suing for a separation. It is immaterial that since the commencement of the action the wife has removed herself from the marital residence. It is noted further that, on this record, plaintiff wife has failed to make out a proper case for temporary alimony and counsel fee, apart from the status of the parties at the time the action was commenced.


Summaries of

Friedman v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 22, 1955
285 App. Div. 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

Friedman v. Friedman

Case Details

Full title:IRENE FRIEDMAN, Respondent, v. A. BENJAMIN FRIEDMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 22, 1955

Citations

285 App. Div. 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Citing Cases

Schultz v. Schultz

Under such circumstances, I do not think the plaintiff wife is entitled to temporary alimony. ( Berman v.…

Baker v. Baker

Brous v. Brous ( 283 App. Div. 1050). Cases in accord with Berman v. Berman; Sommer v. Sommer ( 285 App. Div.…