From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedman v. Baron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

April, 1928.


Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiffs for the sum of $5,000, with costs. We are of opinion that the variance of four feet on the parcel is a material variance, and that the learned trial court had no power to compel plaintiffs to accept less than they had contracted to purchase. Findings of fact and conclusions of law contrary to this decision are reversed, and new findings will be made in accordance herewith. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Friedman v. Baron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Friedman v. Baron

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA FRIEDMAN and Others, Appellants, v. LOUIS BARON and ANNA BARON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1928

Citations

223 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Tellis v. Briamar Associates

The other provisions in the offering plan and the contract that the sellers rely on are clearly derivative…

Sandberg v. Margold Realty Corp.

Each case must be judged on its facts; in consequence, prior cases are authority only in so far as they…