From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedland v. Argentor Holding Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 2, 1926
152 N.E. 415 (N.Y. 1926)

Opinion

Argued January 22, 1926

Decided March 2, 1926

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

I. Maurice Wormser and William M. Silverman for appellant.

John J. Cunneen and Philip J. Ross for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ. Absent: CARDOZO, J.


Summaries of

Friedland v. Argentor Holding Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 2, 1926
152 N.E. 415 (N.Y. 1926)
Case details for

Friedland v. Argentor Holding Corporation

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN FRIEDLAND, Appellant, v. ARGENTOR HOLDING CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 2, 1926

Citations

152 N.E. 415 (N.Y. 1926)
152 N.E. 415

Citing Cases

Powers v. Mulford

The general rule in this State, which the Law Revision Commission has unsuccessfully sought to induce the…

Mclacklan v. Thompson

However, the so-called forfeiture rule (see 62 N.Y. Jur, Vendor and Purchaser, § 137) also has deep roots in…