Friedland Prop., Inc. v. Citizens S. Nat'l Bank

1 Citing case

  1. Peavy v. Bank South

    474 S.E.2d 690 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 3 times

    Consequently, the Bank had a contractual right to reverse the transactions by debiting plaintiffs' account and crediting CNL's account in the amount of the draft, upon learning that the draft had not been properly endorsed. Friedland Properties v. C S Nat. Bank, 148 Ga. App. 259, 260 ( 251 S.E.2d 143). See also OCGA ยง 11-4-207 (1). Nevertheless, it is our view that, a jury question remains as to the complete propriety of the Bank's actions in asserting its contractual rights in this particular case.