From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedheim v. Dinowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1927
221 App. Div. 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

October, 1927.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty and Seeger, JJ.


The parties having stipulated in writing that this motion may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Motion to stay order appointing receiver during the pendency of the appeal from said order granted to the extent of staying the receiver from making sales of the property other than are required in the ordinary conduct of the business, and as to the provision requiring defendant to assign his right, title and interest in the copartnership property.


Summaries of

Friedheim v. Dinowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1927
221 App. Div. 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Friedheim v. Dinowitz

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL FRIEDHEIM, Respondent, v. JOSEPH DINOWITZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1927

Citations

221 App. Div. 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)