From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fridline v. Integrity Vehicle Grp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Oct 31, 2023
4:23-CV-01194 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2023)

Opinion

4:23-CV-01194

10-31-2023

ZACH FRIDLINE, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEGRITY VEHICLE GROUP, INC. and NATCAP, INC. d/b/a VANGUARD VEHICLE ARMOR, Defendants.


ORDER

Matthew W. Brann Chief United States District Judge

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Integrity Vehicle Group, Inc.'s motion to dismiss (Doc. 19) is DENIED.

2. Defendant Integrity Vehicle Group, Inc.'s answer to the amended complaint is due no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order.

BY THE COURT:


Summaries of

Fridline v. Integrity Vehicle Grp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Oct 31, 2023
4:23-CV-01194 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Fridline v. Integrity Vehicle Grp.

Case Details

Full title:ZACH FRIDLINE, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 31, 2023

Citations

4:23-CV-01194 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2023)