From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fricks v. Upton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Jun 4, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-458(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 4, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-458(MTT)

06-04-2012

TIMOTHY MARVIN FRICKS, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN STEVE UPTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On March 19, 2012, the Court dismissed the Plaintiff's complaint against the Defendants but allowed the Plaintiff sixty days to ascertain the identities of the Classification Committee - the proper defendants - and amend his complaint. (Doc. 31). Upon expiration of that sixty day period, the improperly named Defendants and the entire case would be dismissed if the Plaintiff had not identified the proper parties and amended his complaint in accordance with the Order. The sixty day discovery period expired on May 22, 2012, and the Plaintiff has failed to amend his complaint and name the proper parties. Therefore, this case is DISMISSED.

___________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Fricks v. Upton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Jun 4, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-458(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Fricks v. Upton

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY MARVIN FRICKS, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN STEVE UPTON, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Jun 4, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-458(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 4, 2012)