From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frick v. Henry Indus., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jan 3, 2018
Case No. 13-2490-JTM (D. Kan. Jan. 3, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 13-2490-JTM

01-03-2018

RICHARD FRICK on behalf of himself and other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, v. HENRY INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This FLSA collective action alleging unpaid overtime compensation has been resolved by agreement, and the matter is before the court on the plaintiffs' motion for an order approving the Settlement Agreement (Dkt. 249-5) and otherwise resolving the issues in the case. Having reviewed the pleadings, the court hereby certifies the collective action for settlement purposes, and approves the Settlement Agreement and its provisions as fair, appropriate and reasonable.

The court finds that the aggregate payment by defendant Henry Industries is fair and reasonable; the proposed allocation of the settlement proceeds is also fair, reasonable and appropriate. (Dkt. 249-8). Accordingly, the court hereby directs distribution of settlement notice to plaintiffs (Dkt. 249-1), and disbursement of settlement funds to plaintiffs who do not opt-out of the settlement.

In addition, the court approves payment of $53,333.33 in attorney fees to class counsel, $26,228.29 for expenses, and $2000 as plaintiff Frick's service payment.

The Motion for Settlement Approval by Plaintiff (Dkt. 248) is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of January, 2018.

s/ J. Thomas Marten

J. THOMAS MARTEN, JUDGE


Summaries of

Frick v. Henry Indus., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jan 3, 2018
Case No. 13-2490-JTM (D. Kan. Jan. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Frick v. Henry Indus., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD FRICK on behalf of himself and other similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Jan 3, 2018

Citations

Case No. 13-2490-JTM (D. Kan. Jan. 3, 2018)