From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frias v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jul 7, 2006
No. CV 05-4021 PHX NVW (HCE) (D. Ariz. Jul. 7, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV 05-4021 PHX NVW (HCE).

July 7, 2006


ORDER


Before the court is Plaintiff's pro se Civil Rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (doc. # 1). On June 14, 2006, United States Magistrate Judge Hector C. Estrada issued a Report and Recommendation ("R R") (doc. # 7) in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The R R recommends that the complaint be dismissed. No objections to the R R were filed.

The court has reviewed the R R and agrees with the magistrate judge's determinations. Accordingly, the court will accept the R R and dismiss the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge").

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED accepting the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Estrada (doc. # 7).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's pro se Civil Rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (doc. # 1) is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action.


Summaries of

Frias v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jul 7, 2006
No. CV 05-4021 PHX NVW (HCE) (D. Ariz. Jul. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Frias v. Arpaio

Case Details

Full title:Javier Nunez Frias, Plaintiff, v. Joseph Arpaio, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jul 7, 2006

Citations

No. CV 05-4021 PHX NVW (HCE) (D. Ariz. Jul. 7, 2006)