From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freyre v. Revlon, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 1988
136 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

January 28, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Santaella, J.).


This is an action for breach of an employment contract and for wrongful discharge. Plaintiff was hired by the defendant in 1977 and, after a probationary period, except for a temporary layoff in 1982, worked in various capacities until his discharge in 1986. Plaintiff claims that he was a permanent employee who could only be discharged for cause. The record indicates, however, that he was an at-will employee, without a fixed term, whose employment was terminable at any time. (Sabetay v Sterling Drug, 69 N.Y.2d 329, 333; Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp., 58 N.Y.2d 293, 304); Weiner v McGraw-Hill, Inc., 57 N.Y.2d 458.) Specifically, the application form which he signed in 1977 and again in 1982 contained a provision that plaintiff's employment was at will and terminable by either party at any time. The provision stated: "Applicant understands and agrees that if employed by Revlon or any of its subsidiaries, his or her employment will be at will and without fixed term. Revlon or its subsidiaries or applicants may terminate said employment at any time or without prior notice." In view of the above, the defendant's motion for summary judgment should have been granted.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Ross, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Freyre v. Revlon, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 1988
136 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Freyre v. Revlon, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GERMAN FREYRE, Respondent, v. REVLON, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 28, 1988

Citations

136 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Swanson v. Liquid Air Corp.

Plaintiff did not sign anything acknowledging the disclaimer. In this regard, this case is different from a…