From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frey v. State Farm Fire Casualty Company

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 27, 2007
NO. 3:CV-07-323 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2007)

Opinion

NO. 3:CV-07-323.

April 27, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2007, upon consideration of the Plaintiffs' Reply to the Co-Defendant, Kevin Frey's Motion to Dismiss, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. Defendant shall file an answer within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order.

The case of Weston v. Pennsylvania , 251 F.3d 420, 428-29 (3d Cir. 2001), cites extensive authority regarding the pleading requirements under Fed.R.Civ.P. 8. Under notice pleading, a claimant is not required to set out in detail the facts upon which a claim is based. All that is required is adequate information as the basis for the claim. Discovery can provide more detailed basis.


Summaries of

Frey v. State Farm Fire Casualty Company

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 27, 2007
NO. 3:CV-07-323 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Frey v. State Farm Fire Casualty Company

Case Details

Full title:JAMES FREY, and MARY ELLEN FREY, Plaintiffs v. STATE FARM FIRE CASUALTY…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 27, 2007

Citations

NO. 3:CV-07-323 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2007)