From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frey v. State, Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Nov 13, 1992
615 A.2d 1020 (R.I. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-418-Appeal.

November 13, 1992.


ORDER

This case came before the court for oral argument pursuant to an order which had directed the parties to appear in order to show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not be summarily decided in light of United States Investment and Development Corp., et al. v. R.I. Department of Human Services, et al., 606 A.2d 1314 (R.I. 1992).

After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that the trial justice was correct in determining that the state should share the cost of suit, including counsel fee incurred by the plaintiff in recovering a sum of money from the third-party tort feasor in order to reimburse the state for cash assistance and medical payments made by the state for plaintiff's benefit. The principles enunciated in United States Investment are applicable to the case at bar.

Consequently, the state's appeal is denied and dismissed. The summary judgment entered by the Superior Court is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

Frey v. State, Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Nov 13, 1992
615 A.2d 1020 (R.I. 1992)
Case details for

Frey v. State, Department of Human Services

Case Details

Full title:Edward T. FREY v. STATE of Rhode Island DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Nov 13, 1992

Citations

615 A.2d 1020 (R.I. 1992)

Citing Cases

Napolitano v. Burgess, 96-5823 (1997)

The Supreme Court of Rhode Island has held that subrogors are entitled to pursue their own causes of actions…