From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fresquez v. United States

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
May 8, 2023
2:23-CV-00115-GBW-KRS (D.N.M. May. 8, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-CV-00115-GBW-KRS

05-08-2023

ROBERT FRESQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant

BENJAMIN G. MINEGAR Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant CHRISTAL PONCE ROETHLEIN ALEJANDRO ACOSTA, III Attorneys for Plaintiff


BENJAMIN G. MINEGAR

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

CHRISTAL PONCE ROETHLEIN

ALEJANDRO ACOSTA, III

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

KEVIN R. SWEAZEA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant United States of America's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Motion), Doc. 6. The Court, having reviewed the record and noting Plaintiff's consent to the Motion, finds the Motion well-taken and grants the Motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, Doc. 1, on or before June 19, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fresquez v. United States

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
May 8, 2023
2:23-CV-00115-GBW-KRS (D.N.M. May. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Fresquez v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT FRESQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: May 8, 2023

Citations

2:23-CV-00115-GBW-KRS (D.N.M. May. 8, 2023)