From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fresquez v. Minks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 18, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02712-REB-KMT (D. Colo. May. 18, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02712-REB-KMT

05-18-2012

LEROY DAMASIO FRESQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF TED MINKS, MICHAEL FISH, Detention Service Manager, JOHN DOE (CAPTAIN), March 5, 2010, LT. MARTINALLI, LT. G. GITTIN, LT. J. LUCAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SGT. RENFRO, SGT. TROY BETKA, SGT. SCOTT HAPP, SGT. STEVEN WYGANT, OFFICER KATHRINE FEROE, DEPUTY SHERIFF CRUMBAKER, DEPUTY SHERIFF RYAN VIERS, DEPUTY SHERIFF DUSTIN DYELING, DEPUTY SHERIFF ANTHONY KOTRIS, DEPUTY SHERIFF DONALD SPRINGFIELD, DEPUTY SHERIFF HOLLEY, DEPUTY SHERIFF JAMES GELEUDE, DEPUTY SHERIFF JASON RICHARDSON, DEPUTY SHERIFF REID PERRY, DEPUTY SHERIFF WILLIAM BOHM, DEPUTY SHERIFF ERIK BOUGHAM, DEPUTY SHERIFF HERBERT LONGSHORE, DEPUTY SHERIFF #1958 (Name Unknown), COUNSELOR MIKE COLLINS, COUNSELOR SUPERVISOR DEBRA ELUDO, CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, CLAUDIA VAN BUREN/HSA, RAYMOND HERR, Responsible Physician, TRACY HAINES, LPN, and KATHERINE BECERRA, RN, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's "Motion." (Doc. No. 56, filed May 14, 2012.) Plaintiff's Motion seeks a court order directing Defendants or Defendants' counsel to provide the address of several "unserved" defendants—namely, Defendants Van Buren, Becerra, Herr, and Correctional Healthcare Management—so that the United States Marshals Service may properly serve these defendants. Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. No. 56) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED to the extent that Plaintiff seeks addresses for Defendants Herr and Correctional Healthcare Management. The docket indicates that these defendants were served on May 2, 2012 (see Doc. Nos. 49-1 & 49-3) and counsel has since entered an appearance on their behalf (Doc. No. 64, filed May 14, 2012). Therefore, the court will not require Defendants to provide addresses for these defendants.

Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED in part to the extent it seeks addresses for Defendants Van Buren and Becerra. No later than May 25, 2012, Defendants shall file a Status Report either (1) advising the court of forwarding addresses for Defendants Van Buren and Becerra, or (2) advising the court that Defendants and Defendants' counsel do not have access to, or record of, such addresses. If the Status Report indeed includes forwarding addresses for Defendants Van Buren and Becerra, it shall be filed under Restricted Access - Level 2.


Summaries of

Fresquez v. Minks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 18, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02712-REB-KMT (D. Colo. May. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Fresquez v. Minks

Case Details

Full title:LEROY DAMASIO FRESQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF TED MINKS, MICHAEL FISH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 18, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02712-REB-KMT (D. Colo. May. 18, 2012)