From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freshour v. Hicks

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Oct 4, 2021
No. 20-3233-SAC (D. Kan. Oct. 4, 2021)

Opinion

20-3233-SAC

10-04-2021

BRIAN FRESHOUR, Plaintiff, v. DEALAN HICKS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

SAM A. CROW U.S. SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is a civil rights action. By order dated February 8, 2021 (ECF No. 17; “MOSC”), the Court directed Plaintiff to show cause why his Complaint should not be dismissed in favor of an ongoing state proceeding under the Younger abstention doctrine and because of the unexhausted habeas nature of his claim for release. Before the Court is Plaintiff's response to the MOSC (ECF No. 18).

Plaintiff's response argues that he has produced several documents demonstrating the dishonesty and ethical misconduct of the defendants, as well as their violation of state regulations. Plaintiff does not address the application of Younger or the finding that his request for release is a habeas corpus claim that must be fully exhausted before being considered by this Court.

Plaintiff has failed to show good cause why his Complaint should not be dismissed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 5) is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Freshour v. Hicks

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Oct 4, 2021
No. 20-3233-SAC (D. Kan. Oct. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Freshour v. Hicks

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN FRESHOUR, Plaintiff, v. DEALAN HICKS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Oct 4, 2021

Citations

No. 20-3233-SAC (D. Kan. Oct. 4, 2021)