From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freno v. Sutton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 1990
160 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

April 24, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew Tyler, J.).


Plaintiff was shot and stabbed when, in the normal course of his business, he entered an office in a building managed by defendant. While the record shows that defendant did take precautions to provide for the safety of individuals entering the premises by stationing security personnel in the lobby, and that prior criminal activity in the building was minimal (compare, Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 50 N.Y.2d 507; Miller v. State of New York, 62 N.Y.2d 506), there is also evidence that a freight entrance was left open and unattended during business hours, and that building personnel, whose duty it was to screen visitors, rarely if ever inquired as to the business of strangers entering the building. This sufficed to give rise to a triable issue as to whether the precautions taken were reasonable under the circumstances.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Freno v. Sutton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 1990
160 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Freno v. Sutton

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FRENO et al., Respondents, v. GRACE S. SUTTON, Defendant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1990

Citations

160 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
554 N.Y.S.2d 241

Citing Cases

Targovnik v. 460 West 34th Street Associates

The IAS Court properly denied appellants ("the Kaufman defendants") summary judgment in this action arising…

King v. Resource Property Management Corp.

This was error. Plaintiff's evidence that the building owners and managing agent received numerous complaints…