Opinion
2:22-cv-01118-CDS-BNW
11-04-2022
FREMONT EMERGENCY SERVICES (SCHERR), LTD.; Plaintiff, v. UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., Defendants.
James J. Pisanelli, Esq., Bar No. 4027 Debra L. Spinelli, Esq., Bar No. 9695 PISANELLI BICE Jeffrey S. Gleason (Admitted pro hac vice) Jamie R. Kurtz (Admitted pro hac vice) Charlie C. Gokey (Admitted pro hac vice) ROBINS KAPLAN LLP Jessica M. Pettit (Admitted pro hac vice) ROBINS KAPLAN LLP Attorneys for Defendants United HealthCare Insurance Company and United HealthCare Services Renee M. Finch, Esq., #13118 MESSNER REEVES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff, Fremont Emergency Services (Scherr), Ltd. Justin C. Fineberg* Jonathan E. Siegelaub* Annette U. Tucker* Benjamin R. Shiekman* LASH & GOLDBERG LLP *Admitted pro hac vice
James J. Pisanelli, Esq., Bar No. 4027
Debra L. Spinelli, Esq., Bar No. 9695
PISANELLI BICE
Jeffrey S. Gleason (Admitted pro hac vice)
Jamie R. Kurtz (Admitted pro hac vice)
Charlie C. Gokey (Admitted pro hac vice)
ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
Jessica M. Pettit (Admitted pro hac vice)
ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
United HealthCare Insurance Company and United HealthCare Services
Renee M. Finch, Esq., #13118
MESSNER REEVES LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Fremont Emergency Services (Scherr), Ltd.
Justin C. Fineberg*
Jonathan E. Siegelaub*
Annette U. Tucker*
Benjamin R. Shiekman*
LASH & GOLDBERG LLP
*Admitted pro hac vice
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company and United Healthcare Services, Inc. and Plaintiff Fremont Emergency Services (Scherr), Ltd. (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree to the following:
1. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint on September 8, 2022. (ECF No. 29).
2. The Parties stipulated and the Court extended Plaintiff's response to the Motion to Dismiss to October 17, 2022. (ECF No. 36).
3. Defendants filed a Motion to Stay Discovery on September 29, 2022. (ECF No. 40).
4. The Parties stipulated and the Court extended Plaintiff's response to the Motion to Stay Discovery to October 21, 2022, with Defendants' Reply to be due thereafter on November 4, 2022. (ECF No. 44).
5. The Parties stipulated and the Court extended Plaintiff's response to the Motion to Dismiss to October 21, 2022, with Defendants' Reply to be due on November 9, 2022. (ECF No. 46).
6. Given the overlap between the pending Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Stay Discovery, the Parties hereby request that Defendants' Reply to the Motion to Stay Discovery also be due on November 9, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.