From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fregia v. Bright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Oct 27, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-187 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 27, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-187

10-27-2017

JASON FREGIA, Plaintiff, v. ANN BRIGHT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial matters pursuant to General Order 05-07. The court has received and considered the report and recommendation (Doc. No. 52) granting the Defendants' "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint" (Doc. No. 29) and the order severing and transferring Plaintiff's claims relating to Rollover Pass to the Southern District of Texas. (Doc. No. 53.)

The Plaintiff, Jason Fregia, proceeding pro se, filed timely objections to the report and recommendation and the order severing and transferring the Rollover Pass claims to the Southern District of Texas. (Doc. Nos. 55, 57).

A party who files timely written objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation is entitled to a de novo determination of those findings or recommendations to which the party specifically objects. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(c); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2)-(3). "Parties filing objections must specifically identify those findings [to which they object]. Frivolous, conclusive or general objections need not be considered by the district court." Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 410 n.8 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc), overruled on other grounds by Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The court has undertaken a de novo determinationof the report and recommendation, and the order severing and transferring the Rollover Pass claims to the Southern District of Texas. The court concludes that Fregia's objections are without merit.

Courts in this District treat an order transferring venue as a non-case dispositive matter subject to the more deferential "clearly erroneous and contrary to law" standard of review. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a); LOC. R. CV-7(a)(2); Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Zynga, Inc., 2:12-CV-68-JRG-RSP, 2013 WL 12147661, at *1 (E.D. Tex. July 22, 2013). However, out of an abundance of caution, the court will apply the less deferential de novo standard of review to the magistrate judge's order of severance and transfer. --------

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. No. 52) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court, the order of severance and transfer (Doc. No. 53) is separately ADOPTED, and the Defendant's "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint" (Doc. No. 29) is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered separately.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 27th day of October, 2017.

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fregia v. Bright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Oct 27, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-187 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Fregia v. Bright

Case Details

Full title:JASON FREGIA, Plaintiff, v. ANN BRIGHT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Oct 27, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-187 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 27, 2017)