From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeney v. McConnell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Apr 9, 2021
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:21-CV-00179-P (W.D. La. Apr. 9, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL 1:21-CV-00179-P

04-09-2021

RAY SHAWN FREENEY, Plaintiff v. CHRIS MCCONNELL, Defendant


JOSEPH H.L. PEREZ-MONTES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JUDGMENT

DAVID C. JOSEPH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein [ECF No. 3], and after a de novo review of the record, including the Objection filed by Plaintiff [ECF No. 4], having determined that the Magistrate Judge's findings are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, WITH PREJUDICE as to the jurisdictional issue, and WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the merits of Freeney's claim.

THUS, DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers on this 9th day of April 2021.


Summaries of

Freeney v. McConnell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Apr 9, 2021
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:21-CV-00179-P (W.D. La. Apr. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Freeney v. McConnell

Case Details

Full title:RAY SHAWN FREENEY, Plaintiff v. CHRIS MCCONNELL, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 9, 2021

Citations

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:21-CV-00179-P (W.D. La. Apr. 9, 2021)