From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Woolston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 3, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW (D. Colo. Apr. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW

04-03-2012

MARCUS L. FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. WOOLSTON, Vocational Instructor, and LIKEN, Education Department, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Pro Se Incarcerated Plaintiff's Motions for Order (docket nos. 88 and 89) are both GRANTED finding no objection by Defendants. In Defendants' Response to Docket Nos. 88 and 89 (docket no. 91), the Defendants state, in pertinent part, "[A]lthough Plaintiff has not served this subpoena on the BOP as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b)(1), undersigned counsel can represent to the Court that on March 29, 2012, she provided a copy of Docket 89 (the subpoena), to counsel for the BOP, who have agreed to waive service."


Summaries of

Freeman v. Woolston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 3, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW (D. Colo. Apr. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Freeman v. Woolston

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS L. FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. WOOLSTON, Vocational Instructor, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW (D. Colo. Apr. 3, 2012)