Opinion
Civil Action:10-cv-02690-MSK-CBS
10-10-2012
DEMETRIUS TERRELL FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. ALICIA VINEYARD, Defendant.
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402
Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason
Counsel:
Pro Se (appearing by telephone)
Nathalie Erin Cohen
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: MOTION HEARING
Court in Session: 12:21 p.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Discussion regarding the plaintiff's MOTION for an Order (Docket No. 219, filed on 9/26/2012).
ORDERED: The court DENIES without prejudice the plaintiff's MOTION for an Order (Docket No. 219, filed on 9/26/2012).
Discussion regarding the plaintiff's MOTION to Compel (Docket No. 220, filed on 9/26/2012) and the plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Compel re #220 MOTION to Compel (Docket No. 221, filed on 9/26/2012).
The court and the parties go through each of the interrogatories in question to determine exactly which ones the plaintiff is moving to compel: #2 (defense counsel agrees to supplement this response); #3 (defendant is not required to supplement); #4 (defendant is not required to supplement); #5 (withdrawn); #6 (defendant is not required to supplement); #7 (withdrawn by the plaintiff); #8 (defendant is not required to supplement); #9 (defendant is not required to supplement); #10 (defendant is not required to supplement); #12 (defendant is not required to supplement); #13
(withdrawn by the plaintiff); #14 (there is a typo that should be corrected but the defendant is not required to supplement); #15 (defendant is not required to supplement); #16 (defendant is not required to supplement); #23 (defendant is not required to supplement); and #25 (withdrawn by the plaintiff).
ORDERED: The court DENIES the plaintiff's MOTION to Compel (Docket No. 220, filed on 9/26/2012). The court DENIES the plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Compel re #220 MOTION to Compel (Docket No. 221, filed on 9/26/2012). The defendant shall be requested to supplement the response to interrogatory number two (2).
Discussion regarding the defendant's MOTION to Strike #220 MOTION to Compel, #221 MOTION to Supplement #220 MOTION to Compel (Docket No. 225, filed on 9/27/2012).
ORDERED: The court DENIES AS MOOT the defendant's MOTION to Strike #220 MOTION to Compel, #221 MOTION to Supplement #220 MOTION to Compel (Docket No. 225, filed on 9/27/2012).
Discussion regarding the plaintiff's MOTION for Order to Hold the FBOP in Contempt, Issue Sanctions, or any Applicable Measure Available for Disregard of the Courts Order for Supoena [sic] and Request for Telephonic Hearing (Docket No. 228, filed on 10/1/2012).
ORDERED: The court DENIES the plaintiff's MOTION for Order to Hold the FBOP in Contempt, Issue Sanctions, or any Applicable Measure Available for Disregard of the Courts Order for Supoena [sic] and Request for Telephonic Hearing (Docket No. 228, filed on 10/1/2012).
Discussion regarding the plaintiff's MOTION for Subpoena (Docket No. 230, filed on 10/4/2012).
ORDERED: The court GRANTS the plaintiff's MOTION for Subpoena (Docket No. 230, filed on 10/4/2012).
Discussion regarding the plaintiff's MOTION for Production (Docket No. 231, filed on 10/4/2012).
ORDERED: The court DENIES the plaintiff's MOTION for Production (Docket No. 231, filed on 10/4/2012).
The court reminds the parties that the dispositive motion deadline is October 15, 2012 and that all discovery has ended.
Discussion between the court and the plaintiff regarding the filing of motions for summary judgment and Judge Krieger's practice standards.
HEARING CONCLUDED. Court in recess: 1:56 p.m. Total time in court: 01:14
To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.