From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Tampkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 30, 2014
Case No. CV 13-7890 DMG (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-7890 DMG (JCG)

12-30-2014

ERNEST FREEMAN III, Petitioner, v. C. TAMPKINS, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;



2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and



3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. DATED: December 30, 2014

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Freeman v. Tampkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 30, 2014
Case No. CV 13-7890 DMG (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Freeman v. Tampkins

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST FREEMAN III, Petitioner, v. C. TAMPKINS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 30, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 13-7890 DMG (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2014)