From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Stowitsky

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 24, 2006
C.A. 05-1550 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 24, 2006)

Opinion

C.A. 05-1550.

January 24, 2006


ORDER


A rule was issued upon the Plaintiff, James Freeman, to show good cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with this court's order dated December 6, 2005, which directed him to file an Amended Complaint by December 27, 2006, that would set forth each claim against each Defendant in a separate paragraph and with such clarity and precision that each Defendant will be able to discern what the Plaintiff is claiming and to frame a responsive pleading. The rule was returnable January 19, 2006. Having failed to file an amended complaint or show good cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed.


Summaries of

Freeman v. Stowitsky

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 24, 2006
C.A. 05-1550 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Freeman v. Stowitsky

Case Details

Full title:JAMES FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. PAUL J. STOWITSKY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 24, 2006

Citations

C.A. 05-1550 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 24, 2006)