From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jun 12, 2001
46 S.W.3d 663 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. WD 58489

June 12, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY HONORABLE THOMAS C. CLARK, JUDGE.

Tara L. Jensen, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, Missouri for appellant[s].

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea Mazza Follett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Missouri for respondent[s].

Before Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Joseph M. Ellis, Judge and Ronald R. Holliger, Judge.


ORDER


Maurice Freeman appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Freeman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jun 12, 2001
46 S.W.3d 663 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Freeman v. State

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Jun 12, 2001

Citations

46 S.W.3d 663 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)