From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 25, 1938
117 S.W.2d 75 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)

Opinion

No. 19787.

Delivered May 25, 1938.

Statement of Facts — Bills of Exception.

Matters complained of in bills of exception, relating to the action of the trial court in refusing to grant a continuance for absent witnesses and to direct a peremptory verdict of acquittal, can not be appraised in absence of a statement of facts.

Appeal from the District Court of Nolan County. Hon. A. S. Mauzey, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for theft of chickens; penalty, confinement in penitentiary for eighteen months.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Robert P. Brown, of San Angelo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Conviction is for the theft of chickens, punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for eighteen months.

The record is before us without statement of facts. There are three bills of exception brought forward, one complaining of the action of the court in refusing to grant a continuance for absent witnesses; and another complaining because the court declined to direct a peremptory verdict of acquittal. It is apparent that the matters complained of in these bills can not be appraised in the absence of the statement of facts. Another bill complains of the charge on circumstantial evidence. We find no basis for the criticism directed at said instruction.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Freeman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 25, 1938
117 S.W.2d 75 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)
Case details for

Freeman v. State

Case Details

Full title:W. C. FREEMAN v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 25, 1938

Citations

117 S.W.2d 75 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)
117 S.W.2d 75