From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 25, 2007
No. CIV S 07-1310 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S 07-1310 LKK DAD P.

October 25, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's October 17, 2007 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Freeman v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 25, 2007
No. CIV S 07-1310 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2007)
Case details for

Freeman v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:CLIFTON FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 25, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S 07-1310 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2007)