From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Sisco

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 24, 2007
No. CIV S 07-1310 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S 07-1310 LKK DAD P.

September 24, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner has requested an extension of time to file a response to the respondent's August 30, 2007 answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. The request will be granted.

Petitioner has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's September 17, 2007 motion for an extension of time is granted;

2. Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file a response; and

3. Petitioner's August 30, 2007 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Freeman v. Sisco

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 24, 2007
No. CIV S 07-1310 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2007)
Case details for

Freeman v. Sisco

Case Details

Full title:CLIFTON FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISCO, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 24, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S 07-1310 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2007)