From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Scot. Cnty.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 22, 2020
No. 19-7830 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-7830

06-22-2020

DWAYNE E. FREEMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. SCOTLAND COUNTY, Respondent - Appellee.

Dwayne E. Freeman, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-hc-02103-FL) Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwayne E. Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dwayne E. Freeman appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) petition as duplicative and an improper vehicle for his claims. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Freeman's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Freeman has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Freeman v. Scot. Cnty.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 22, 2020
No. 19-7830 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Freeman v. Scot. Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE E. FREEMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. SCOTLAND COUNTY, Respondent…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 22, 2020

Citations

No. 19-7830 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2020)