Opinion
20-2371
11-22-2022
JAMES FREEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a/k/a SAIC, Defendant-Appellee.
Christopher E. Brown, THE BROWN FIRM PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Kimberley Lunetta, Miami, Florida, Matthew J. Sharbaugh, Zachary S. Stinson, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: November 17, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01502-LMB-MSN)
ON BRIEF:
Christopher E. Brown, THE BROWN FIRM PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant.
Kimberley Lunetta, Miami, Florida, Matthew J. Sharbaugh, Zachary S. Stinson, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Freeman appeals the district court's order denying his motion for partial summary judgment and granting Defendant summary judgment on Freeman's discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. Freeman v. Sci. Applications Int'l Corp., No. 1:19-cv-01502-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED