From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Hurst

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 9, 2022
22-cv-05022-MMC (D. Nev. Nov. 9, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-05022-MMC

11-09-2022

SCOTT FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN HURST, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SAVANT HWP, INC.'S MOTION TO TRANSFER ACTION TO DISTRICT OF NEVADA; VACATING HEARING

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Before the Court is defendant Savant HWP, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue, filed October 20, 2022, as amended October 25, 2022, whereby said defendant seeks an order transferring the above-titled action to the District of Nevada. Plaintiff Scott Freeman has filed a Notice of Joinder. No other response to the motion has been filed.

Having read and considered the unopposed motion, the Court finds, for the reasons stated therein, that transfer is in the interests of justice. In particular, plaintiff is pursuing in the District of Nevada an earlier-filed action, see Freeman v. Hurst, 2:22-cv-01433, in which he has sued the same defendants named in the above-titled action, based on the same allegations made in the instant action, a factor weighing strongly in favor of transfer. See A.J. Industries v. United States District Court, 503 F.2d 384, 389 (9th Cir. 1974) (holding "feasibility of consolidation" with action in transferee court is "significant factor in a transfer decision"). Additionally, "the respective parties' contacts with the forum" and "the contacts relating to the plaintiff's cause of action," see Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc., 211 F.3d 495, 498-99 (9th Cir. 2000) (identifying factors), weigh in favor of transfer, as (1) the vast majority of the acts alleged by plaintiff occurred in Nevada, (2) the majority of the defendants reside in Nevada, (3) plaintiff, who, as noted, joins in the motion to transfer, was a citizen of Nevada during the period of time in which he asserts his claims arose, and (4) what appears to be the only connection to this district is the residence of Russell Burbank, a defendant who is alleged to have engaged in wrongdoing while acting as the trustee for two Nevada corporations and who has not opposed transfer.

The hearing scheduled for December 2, 2022, is hereby VACATED.

Plaintiff presently resides in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Accordingly, the motion is hereby GRANTED, and the above-titled action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the District of Nevada.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Freeman v. Hurst

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 9, 2022
22-cv-05022-MMC (D. Nev. Nov. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Freeman v. Hurst

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN HURST, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 9, 2022

Citations

22-cv-05022-MMC (D. Nev. Nov. 9, 2022)