From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2022
2:21-cv-1982 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1982 KJM AC P

06-29-2022

DORN ALLEN FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. HILL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. A motion to dismiss is fully briefed. ECF Nos. 12 (Respondent's motion), 14 (Petitioner's opposition to motion, captioned as a traverse), 15 (reply).

Petitioner has filed a notice with the court indicating that he never received a copy of Respondent's reply. ECF No. 16. The notice states that there is a backlog in the prison mail system, and petitioner opines that the filing may have been lost. Id. In light of this information, Respondent will be directed to re-serve the reply brief on petitioner.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent shall serve Petitioner by mail with a duplicate copy of the reply filed March 30, 2022 (ECF No. 15), within five days of this order.


Summaries of

Freeman v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2022
2:21-cv-1982 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Freeman v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:DORN ALLEN FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. HILL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-1982 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)