From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Hertzoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 7, 1992
179 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 7, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.).


In connection with the claim that defendant New York University (NYU) negligently supervised its premises, the parties are entitled to discovery for a reasonable period prior to the fire which, it is alleged, was caused by NYU's students dropping incendiary material from their dormitory onto a neighboring building. The three year period permitted here is reasonable (Matos v. City of New York, 78 A.D.2d 834). For the purposes of discovery, a history of the discarding of refuse by NYU students onto the neighboring roof, and the fire marshall's report which attributes the cause to "probably careless discard of smoking material" sufficiently establishes relevancy.

We have considered appellant's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Freeman v. Hertzoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 7, 1992
179 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Freeman v. Hertzoff

Case Details

Full title:PETER FREEMAN et al., Respondents, v. BEVERLY L. HERTZOFF et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 7, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
577 N.Y.S.2d 839

Citing Cases

Shakir v. Convent 1 LLC

Based on the papers submitted, the court finds that plaintiff is entitled to an order compelling defendants…

Cook v. HMC Times Square Hotel, LLC

“Supreme Court is vested with broad discretion to supervise disclosure and [ ] its orders in this regard…