From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Evans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 4, 2009
No. CIV S-07-1898 LKK CHS P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1898 LKK CHS P.

June 4, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas corpus proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In this case, findings and recommendations have been entered and the case is awaiting review by the district judge. It does not appear that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's June 1, 2009 request for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Freeman v. Evans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 4, 2009
No. CIV S-07-1898 LKK CHS P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Freeman v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:DORN ALLEN FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. M. S. Evans, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 4, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1898 LKK CHS P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2009)