From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Dept. of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 28, 1972
195 S.E.2d 203 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)

Summary

In Freeman v. Dept. of Public Safety, 127 Ga. App. 773, 774 (195 S.E.2d 203), a case in which this court denied certiorari, the Georgia Court of Appeals held, "This shows a clear legislative intent to provide that appeals from orders or decisions rendered under the Safety Responsibility Act are controlled exclusively by the appellate procedures outlined in that Act."

Summary of this case from Pope v. Cokinos

Opinion

47552.

ARGUED OCTOBER 2, 1972.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 28, 1972. REHEARING DENIED DECEMBER 19, 1972.

Suspension of driver's license. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Williams.

Malcolm H. Ringel, for appellant.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Courtney Wilder Stanton, Assistant Attorney General. Thomas W. Greene, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


The appellant's driver's license, motor vehicle registration certificate and plates were suspended on May 8, 1972, under the Georgia Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act. Ga. L. 1951, p. 565 et seq. ( Code Ann. § 92A-601 et seq.). On May 25, 1972, the appellant filed a petition in the superior court seeking a review of the suspension order under § 20 of the Administrative Procedure Act. Ga. L. 1964, pp. 338, 354 ( Code Ann. § 3A-120). The trial court granted the appellee's motion to dismiss on the ground of no jurisdiction. Held:

Section 2 of the Safety Responsibility Act provides that persons aggrieved by orders under the Act have the right to enter an appeal to the superior court in the same manner as appeals from the court of ordinary. Ga. L. 1951, pp. 565, 567 ( Code Ann. § 92A-602). An appeal from a judgment of the court of ordinary must be entered within four days from the date of the judgment. Code § 6-202. Section 20 of the Administrative Procedure Act provides for judicial review of a final agency decision in a contested case by filing a petition for review within thirty days after service of the final decision or within thirty days after a decision on a requested rehearing. Ga. L. 1964, pp. 338, 354 ( Code Ann. § 3A-120). The Administrative Procedure Act which was enacted subsequent to the Safety Responsibility Act while not exempting the Department of Public Safety from its provisions, provides in part: "Nothing in this law shall be held to ... limit or repeal additional requirements imposed by statute or otherwise recognized by law." Ga. L. 1964, pp. 338, 356 ( Code Ann. § 3A-122). This shows a clear legislative intent to provide that appeals from orders or decisions rendered under the Safety Responsibility Act are controlled exclusively by the appellate procedures outlined in that Act. See Burson v. Bishop, 117 Ga. App. 602 (1) ( 161 S.E.2d 518). As the appellant failed to follow those provisions for review by entering her appeal within four days of the order, the judgment of the superior court in dismissing her petition for review for lack of jurisdiction was correct.

Judgment affirmed. Evans and Stolz, JJ., concur.

ARGUED OCTOBER 2, 1972 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 28, 1972 — REHEARING DENIED DECEMBER 19, 1972 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Freeman v. Dept. of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 28, 1972
195 S.E.2d 203 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)

In Freeman v. Dept. of Public Safety, 127 Ga. App. 773, 774 (195 S.E.2d 203), a case in which this court denied certiorari, the Georgia Court of Appeals held, "This shows a clear legislative intent to provide that appeals from orders or decisions rendered under the Safety Responsibility Act are controlled exclusively by the appellate procedures outlined in that Act."

Summary of this case from Pope v. Cokinos
Case details for

Freeman v. Dept. of Public Safety

Case Details

Full title:FREEMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 28, 1972

Citations

195 S.E.2d 203 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)
195 S.E.2d 203

Citing Cases

Pope v. Cokinos

Not only are the informal hearing provisions of the Motor Vehicle Responsibility Law not repealed, they are…