From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. City of Montgomery

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 27, 1952
59 So. 2d 358 (Ala. Crim. App. 1952)

Opinion

3 Div. 948.

May 27, 1952.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Montgomery County, Eugene W. Carter, J.

John N. McGee, Jr., Montgomery, for appellant.

D. Eugene Loe, Montgomery, for appellee.


This prosecution is based on a violation of a city ordinance. Upon conviction in the recorder's court, the accused took an appeal to the circuit court. The instant appeal follows a judgment of conviction in the latter jurisdiction.

Appellant's counsel has not filed a brief in this court; neither has he assigned errors.

Prosecutions for the violations of municipal ordinances are in their nature quasi criminal, and on appeal to the appellate court errors must be duly assigned. Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4, 109 So. 571; Arnold v. City of Mobile, 33 Ala. App. 94, 30 So.2d 40.

The judgment of conviction in the court below is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Freeman v. City of Montgomery

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 27, 1952
59 So. 2d 358 (Ala. Crim. App. 1952)
Case details for

Freeman v. City of Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:FREEMAN v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: May 27, 1952

Citations

59 So. 2d 358 (Ala. Crim. App. 1952)
59 So. 2d 358

Citing Cases

Wyatt v. City of Birmingham

With reference to assignments of error and brief of appellant's counsel the same rules obtain as in civil…

Jackson v. City of Montgomery

HARWOOD, Judge. Affirmed on authority of Freeman v. City of Montgomery, ante, p. 473, 59 So.2d 358.…