Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00084-AP
04-26-2012
GINGER FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
For Plaintiff : Gail C. Harriss GAIL C. HARRISS, LLC For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney District of Colorado Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley Special Assistant United States Attorney Gail C. Harriss GAIL C. HARRISS, LLC Attorney for Plaintiff JAMES F. WALSH United States Attorney WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney District of Colorado Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley Assistant Regional Counsel Attorneys for Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Gail C. Harriss
GAIL C. HARRISS, LLC
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: January 12, 2012
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: February 6, 2012
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: April 6, 2012
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of her knowledge, Counsel for Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of her knowledge, Counsel for Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES
Counsel for Plaintiff states: To the best of her knowledge, this case does not involve unusual claims or defenses.
Counsel for Defendant states: To the best of her knowledge, this case does not involve unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
There are no other matters anticipated.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
The parties respectfully request the following briefing schedule:
A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: June 5, 2012
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: July 5, 2012
C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: July 20, 2012
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiffs Statement:
Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement:
Defendant does not request oral argument
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11. OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.
BY THE COURT:
John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
____________
Gail C. Harriss
GAIL C. HARRISS, LLC
Attorney for Plaintiff
JAMES F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
____________
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Assistant Regional Counsel
Attorneys for Defendant.