From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Jan 24, 2013
Case No. 1:12CV00086 SNLJ (E.D. Mo. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12CV00086 SNLJ

01-24-2013

PAUL FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. FRANKIE ADAMS, et al. Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, #44. The motion will be denied.

There is no constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in civil cases. Nelson v. Redfield Lithograph Printing, 728 F.2d 1003, 1004 (8th Cir. 1984). In determining whether to appoint counsel, the Court considers several factors, including (1) whether the plaintiff has presented non-frivolous allegations supporting his or her prayer for relief; (2) whether the plaintiff will substantially benefit from the appointment of counsel; (3) whether there is a need to further investigate and present the facts related to the plaintiff's allegations; and (4) whether the factual and legal issues presented by the action are complex. See Johnson v. Williams, 788 F.2d 1319, 1322-23 (8th Cir. 1986); Nelson, 728 F.2d at 1005.

After considering these factors, the Court finds that the facts and legal issues involved are not so complicated that the appointment of counsel is warranted at this time.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Freeman v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Jan 24, 2013
Case No. 1:12CV00086 SNLJ (E.D. Mo. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Freeman v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:PAUL FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. FRANKIE ADAMS, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12CV00086 SNLJ (E.D. Mo. Jan. 24, 2013)