From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. City of Port Hueneme

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2018
CASE NO: 2:16-cv-07172-JAK (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO: 2:16-cv-07172-JAK (GJSx)

01-03-2018

ROSE P. FREEMAN an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORT HUENEME, et al. Defendants.


JUDGMENT

The motion for summary judgment brought by defendants City of Port Hueneme and Carmen Nichols (collectively "Defendants") having been granted, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Judgment is entered against Plaintiff Rose Freeman and in favor of Defendants;

2. Plaintiff Rose Freeman shall take nothing as to the claims advanced in this action, and the action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety; and

3. Defendants may seek to recover costs in an amount to be determined based on the filing and review of the appropriate application. Any costs awarded may accrue interest at the legal rate as provided by law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 3, 2018

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Freeman v. City of Port Hueneme

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2018
CASE NO: 2:16-cv-07172-JAK (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Freeman v. City of Port Hueneme

Case Details

Full title:ROSE P. FREEMAN an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORT HUENEME, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 3, 2018

Citations

CASE NO: 2:16-cv-07172-JAK (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2018)