From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeland v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 8, 2013
CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00740 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00740

01-08-2013

LISA FREELAND, Plaintiff, v. YOLANDA RUSSELL, et al., Defendants.


JUDGE SMITH


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP


DISMISSAL ENTRY

Defendants have informed the Court that this matter has been settled and the settlement check was sent to Plaintiff on October 31, 2012, and was cashed on November 5, 2012. Defendants attempted to contact Plaintiff to submit a stipulation of dismissal to the Court, however, Plaintiff failed to respond. The Court was able to contact Plaintiff and she confirmed that she received the check.

Since the parties have resolved all claims in this action, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

GEORGE C. SMITH , JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Freeland v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 8, 2013
CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00740 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Freeland v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:LISA FREELAND, Plaintiff, v. YOLANDA RUSSELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00740 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2013)