From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeland v. N.Y. Communications Ctr. Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 20, 1993
193 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 20, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Hansel McGee, J.).


Plaintiff commenced this lawsuit for damages for physical injuries allegedly suffered by him in a construction accident which occurred in a building owned by defendants. At a pretrial conference held in connection with this matter, the parties stipulated, in part, that any impleader action was to be commenced within 45 days of the completion of all depositions. However, despite this agreement, the third-party complaint was not served until more than 115 days after the depositions had been concluded, and plaintiff moved for a severance, as well as permission to file a note of issue. In that regard, it is undisputed that defendants not only voluntarily entered into the subject stipulation but were aware of the existence of third-party defendant, Dynamic Drywell Corporation, plaintiff's employer, since, at the very least, the time that the complaint was originally served, yet inexplicably delayed in bringing the third-party action. Consequently, the Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff's motion for severance (CPLR 603).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Freeland v. N.Y. Communications Ctr. Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 20, 1993
193 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Freeland v. N.Y. Communications Ctr. Assoc

Case Details

Full title:DOLINGTON FREELAND et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK COMMUNICATIONS CENTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 20, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
598 N.Y.S.2d 454

Citing Cases

Thomas v. 215 E. 68TH St., L.P.

Severance Severing a third-party action is a matter of discretion (Pena v City of New York, 222 AD2d 233 [1st…

Stewart v. Bogopa-Junction, Inc.

These circumstances (see Freeland v New York Communications Ctr. Assocs., 193 AD2d 511; Miro v Branford…