From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freedom Mortg. Corp. v. Madariaga

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 2, 2021
2:19-cv-2432 MCE DB PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-2432 MCE DB PS

08-02-2021

FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTINA MADARIAGA, and SIELA MADARIAGA, Defendants.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant Christina Madariaga is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). (ECF No. 11.) On November 9, 2020, defendant filed a document styled “MOTION REQUEST FOR ADMISSION.” (ECF No. 30.) The document cites no legal authority and simply asks that the court grant defendant monetary and injunctive relief. Moreover, the motion was not noticed for hearing in violation of the Local Rules. Accordingly, the motion will be denied without prejudice to renewal.

Review of the docket also finds that a previous order served on defendant was returned as undeliverable and that the defendant recently provided an updated address. Defendant is advised that it is a party's responsibility to keep the court apprised of the party's current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's November 9, 2020 motion (ECF No. 30) is denied without prejudice to renewal.


Summaries of

Freedom Mortg. Corp. v. Madariaga

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 2, 2021
2:19-cv-2432 MCE DB PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Freedom Mortg. Corp. v. Madariaga

Case Details

Full title:FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTINA MADARIAGA, and SIELA…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 2, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-2432 MCE DB PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2021)