Opinion
Case No. 07-cv-356-SM.
November 3, 2009
ORDER
Re: Document No. 65, Assented to Motion to Clarify [60] Order on Motion to Dismiss, [61] Judgment
Ruling: Denied. The order dated September 30, 2009 (doc. No. 60) did not overlook the state's motion to dismiss (doc. No. 14) — that motion was denied by separate order dated August 7, 2008 (doc. No. 44). And, the "State of New Hampshire's Supplemental Memorandum of Law Regarding Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint in Support of the Motion to Dismiss" (doc. No. 53), is, as the title suggests, a memorandum of law, not a motion. To the extent the state, as intervenor, supported the motion to dismiss that was granted, the state's position prevailed.