Freedman v. Fed. Elections Comm'n

Full title: JOSHUA FREEDMAN, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 18, 2022

CIVIL 1:22-cv-0298 (M.D. Pa. May. 18, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 1:22-cv-0298

05-18-2022

JOSHUA FREEDMAN, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION, Defendant.

SYLVIA H. RAMBO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

SYLVIA H. RAMBO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 18^th day of May, 2022, upon consideration of the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6), to which no objections have been timely filed, and the court having satisfied itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record, Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010) (explaining that judges should review dispositive legal issues raised by the report for clear error), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1) The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in part;

2) Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to file this case is another judicial district; and

3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.