From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freedman v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 12, 2023
No. 1371-23S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 12, 2023)

Opinion

1371-23S

06-12-2023

IAN H. FREEDMAN & TANYA FREEDMAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge

On April 6, 2023, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the ground that petitioners paid the tax liability for tax year 2019 before the issuance of the notice of deficiency, and, therefore, the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid. See Bendheim v. Commissioner, 214 F.2d 26, 28 (2d Cir. 1954). Although the Court provided petitioners an opportunity to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion, no response has been received from petitioners.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid.


Summaries of

Freedman v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 12, 2023
No. 1371-23S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Freedman v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:IAN H. FREEDMAN & TANYA FREEDMAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 12, 2023

Citations

No. 1371-23S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 12, 2023)