From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freed v. Truax

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Aug 12, 2014
CAUSE NO. 3:12-CV-177 CAN (N.D. Ind. Aug. 12, 2014)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:12-CV-177 CAN

08-12-2014

MICHAEL G. FREED, Plaintiff, v. CAPT. TRUAX, and LEUTINANT CLOTHIA, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

Michael G. Freed, a pro se prisoner, filed a response to the defendant's motion for summary judgment. However, in the order of June 16, 2014, the court explained why that response was insufficient to defeat the motion and afforded him until July 24, 2014, to file a supplemental brief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e)(4). He was cautioned that if he did not respond by that deadline, the summary judgment motion would be granted without further delay. That deadline has now passed, but he has not responded.

For the reasons more fully explained in this court's order of June 16, 2014, (DE 43), the motion for summary judgment (DE 32) is GRANTED. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case and to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

Dated this 12th Day of August, 2014.

S/Christopher A. Nuechterlein

Christopher A. Nuechterlein

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Freed v. Truax

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Aug 12, 2014
CAUSE NO. 3:12-CV-177 CAN (N.D. Ind. Aug. 12, 2014)
Case details for

Freed v. Truax

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL G. FREED, Plaintiff, v. CAPT. TRUAX, and LEUTINANT CLOTHIA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Date published: Aug 12, 2014

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:12-CV-177 CAN (N.D. Ind. Aug. 12, 2014)