From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fredricks v. Mennin

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 15, 2022
22-CV-5920 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-5920 (LTS)

09-15-2022

NIGEL FREDRICKS, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE MENNIN, PART B1; JUDGE BIDEN PART TAP A; KENNETH GILBERTH, 18-B; D.A. JOHN DOE, TAP A; MARTHA LINBURGER, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order dated July 12, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff, within 30 days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and prisoner authorization or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application and prisoner authorization or paid the fees. Accordingly, the Court dismisses the complaint without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fredricks v. Mennin

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 15, 2022
22-CV-5920 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Fredricks v. Mennin

Case Details

Full title:NIGEL FREDRICKS, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE MENNIN, PART B1; JUDGE BIDEN PART TAP…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 15, 2022

Citations

22-CV-5920 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2022)