From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fredricks v. Doe

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 8, 2022
22-CV-0622 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-0622 (LTS)

03-08-2022

NIGEL FREDRICKS, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN JANE DOE, O.B.C.C.; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER N. OLIVA, #1352; CAPTAIN OFFICER E. GONZALEZ, #1266, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order dated January 24, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) and prisoner authorization or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application and prisoner authorization or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fredricks v. Doe

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 8, 2022
22-CV-0622 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Fredricks v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:NIGEL FREDRICKS, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN JANE DOE, O.B.C.C.; CORRECTIONAL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Citations

22-CV-0622 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2022)