From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fredrick v. Parrilla

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 13, 2022
20 Civ. 5738 (AT) (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 13, 2022)

Opinion

20 Civ. 5738 (AT) (JLC)

09-13-2022

NIGEL FREDRICKS, Plaintiff, v. ALEXIS PARRILLA, DUAYNE JOHN, JOHN SHAHEEN, TRAVIS RICHARDS, ANDREW HENRY, and OMAR SMITH, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE

Having received no objections to the Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”), ECF No. 121, of the Honorable James L. Cott, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error and found none. Oquendo v. Colvin, No. 12 Civ. 4527, 2014 WL 4160222, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2014).

The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 89 and 106, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se, and close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fredrick v. Parrilla

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 13, 2022
20 Civ. 5738 (AT) (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Fredrick v. Parrilla

Case Details

Full title:NIGEL FREDRICKS, Plaintiff, v. ALEXIS PARRILLA, DUAYNE JOHN, JOHN SHAHEEN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 13, 2022

Citations

20 Civ. 5738 (AT) (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 13, 2022)