From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fredland v. Bernstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 21, 1995
213 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 21, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.).


Plaintiff's arguments with respect to the preclusive effect of the 1987 divorce judgment are without merit in light of this Court's prior determination specifically authorizing defendant to seek reimbursement for subsequently assessed tax liability for the 1977, 1978 and 1979 tax years (Fredland v. Bernstein, 165 A.D.2d 654). We see no error in the Special Referee's evaluation of the matter which took into account the joint benefits that mutually accrued to the parties as a result of the deferred taxation (Zelnik v. Zelnik, 169 A.D.2d 317).

We have considered plaintiffs' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Fredland v. Bernstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 21, 1995
213 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Fredland v. Bernstein

Case Details

Full title:MIO FREDLAND, Appellant, v. LAWSON F. BERNSTEIN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 21, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 824